The most comprehensive diabetes knowledge base online. Understand your diabetes. Know your supplies. Make better decisions.
MDS Diabetes
Diabetes
Encyclopedia
Shop Supplies β†’
Researchβœ“ Reviewed for accuracy

Tubeless AID System Beats Standard Pump in Type 1 Diabetes

A tubeless automated insulin delivery system kept blood sugar in a healthy range significantly more often than a standard sensor pump over 12 weeks.

M
MDS Diabetes Team
Β·4 min read
𝕏f
Key takeaways
  • βœ“AID system users spent 6.5% more time in healthy blood sugar range β€” about 1.5 extra hours per day
  • βœ“The AID system also reduced time spent too high or too low, and improved glucose stability
  • βœ“Both devices were safe with no severe hypoglycaemia or diabetic ketoacidosis in either group
Quick specs
JournalDiabetologia
Year2024
PMID38634887

What Was This Study About?

Researchers in South Korea compared two types of wearable, tubeless insulin pumps in adults with type 1 diabetes. One was an automated insulin delivery (AID) system β€” sometimes called a "closed-loop" or "artificial pancreas" system β€” that automatically adjusts insulin based on continuous glucose readings. The other was a sensor-augmented pump (SAP), which shows glucose data but requires the user to make manual adjustments.

Who Was Studied?

104 adults aged 19–69 with type 1 diabetes took part across 13 hospitals in South Korea. Half used the AID system and half used the standard sensor pump for 12 weeks. All participants had reasonably controlled diabetes at the start (HbA1c below 10%).

What Did They Measure?

The main goal was Time in Range (TIR) β€” the percentage of the day blood sugar stayed in a healthy zone (70–180 mg/dL). More time in range means better, more stable glucose control with fewer highs and lows.

Key Results

The AID group spent significantly more time in the healthy blood sugar range:

  • AID system: TIR improved from 62.1% to 71.5% β€” a gain of nearly 10 percentage points
  • Standard pump: TIR improved only slightly, from 64.7% to 66.9%
  • The difference between groups was 6.5%, which is clinically meaningful (roughly 1.5 extra hours per day in range)

The AID group also had less time with blood sugar too high or too low, and more stable overall glucose levels.

What About HbA1c?

Both groups saw similar improvements in HbA1c (a 3-month blood sugar average), dropping to around 6.3–6.4% in both groups. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant, suggesting both devices can support good long-term control.

Was It Safe?

Yes. There were no cases of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) or severe low blood sugar in either group throughout the 12-week trial.

What Does This Mean for Patients?

If you have type 1 diabetes and are considering an insulin pump, a tubeless AID system may offer better day-to-day glucose stability than a standard sensor pump β€” without the hassle of tubing. Talk to your diabetes care team about whether an AID system might be right for you.

References & Sources

Frequently asked questions

A tubeless AID system sticks directly to your skin with no tubing. It uses your continuous glucose monitor readings to automatically adjust insulin delivery β€” so it does much of the decision-making for you. A standard sensor pump also has no tubing and shows your glucose data, but you still need to manually decide when to give extra insulin.
Editorial note
This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult your healthcare provider before making changes to your diabetes management. Last reviewed: July 16, 2026 by the MDS Diabetes editorial team.
What to do next
πŸ“š
Read more Research articles
Explore all guides in this topic
β†’
πŸ›’
Shop related supplies at MDS
FSA/HSA eligible Β· Free shipping $60+
β†’
Topics
type 1 diabetesinsulin pumpautomated insulin deliveryclosed loop systemcontinuous glucose monitoringtime in rangeresearch

Related articles

Ask Mila about diabetes